x
Investment Opportunities

The Dependency Ratio: Use This Number to Find Good International Investments

The Dependency Ratio: Use This Number to Find Good International Investments
  • PublishedJanuary 29, 2010

Economists have spent decades analyzing why some countries grow and others don’t.

You can talk for ages about factors like education, disposable income, export growth, interest rates, business and tax regulations, port traffic and 50 other variables. It all adds up to a complex equation.

But you can actually boil a part of a country’s economic growth down to one number – a number that you can predict for decades with near certainty. What’s more, it’s profitable.

Here’s how it works…

This Simple Number Can Trump the Statistics

Forget mind-boggling equations and the morass of government statistics. You can attribute much a country’s growth rate to a single, simple factor: good, old-fashioned elbow grease.

That’s where the “dependency ratio” comes in. A dependency ratio measures the number of people either too young or too old to work, compared to the number of people within working age.

(For the statistic’s sake, the working age is considered to be 15 to 64. That’s not to say 64 is too old to work, though. Plus, I know plenty of 30-year-olds who can’t seem to get a thing done!)

Let’s deal with the United States first…

America’s Dependency Ratio: Better Than Average Now… But Faces Problems Later

The current dependency ratio for the United States is 49%. That means for every 10 working adults, there are 4.9 people that need to be supported, be it through social security or childcare.

Therefore, a lower dependency ratio is better for economic growth. Not only does it mean more people in the workforce are contributing to national productivity, but also that more resources can be directed towards investments in growth initiatives.

The United States ranks pretty well, compared to a worldwide dependency ratio of 52%. But there’s more to it than that – two factors affect the dependency ratio…

  • Age: One way to get a lower dependency ratio would be to reduce the number of people above 65. Thankfully, though, nobody will try to do that without a major international outcry!
  • Birthrate: Over the past 30 years or so, the American “baby-boomer” generation has fattened up the U.S. working-age population. That’s kept the dependency ratio low and resulted in much of the growth since World War II.

Unfortunately, this will come back to haunt us…

Dependency Ratio increases with aging baby boomers.

Why the United States Could Struggle with Economic Growth

With baby-boomers now entering retirement age, it will hike the dependency ratio up and stifle economic growth.

Since birthrates are measurable and the population at various ages stays pretty consistent for about 70 or 80 years, dependency ratios are predictable well into the future.

As the ratio rises up to 2050, we’ll face an uphill struggle for economic growth.

It could be worse, though. Let’s see what country to avoid – and another set to grow explosively…

China’s Dependency Ratio: Who Will Look After Its Aging Population?

Imagine if you restricted your population to the point where families were only allowed to have one child over a 30-year spell.

  • You’d initially have a great dependency ratio with fewer children to care for, which would spur shorter-term growth.
  • But that artificially restrained younger generation would eventually have to care for its aging parents.

That policy is actually a reality. In China, authorities estimate that this prevented 250 million births between 1980 and 2000.

And you can see how that lower dependency ratio has contributed to China’s explosive growth. With the ratio currently under 40% China is in a perfect position. Unfortunately, the country will need to pay for it in the future.

Now, this doesn’t mean that Chinese stocks will dip over the next few months… but it might happen sooner than you’d think.

According to Wang Feng, a professor of Social Development at Fudan University: “The consistently low birth rate since the 1990s will cause a noticeable contraction in newly available labor. The section of the population between 20 and 24 years of age will decrease sharply from 125 million in 2010 to just 68 million in 2020 – a 50% decline in only 10 years.”

So what countries will benefit from a lower dependency ratio?

India’s Dependency Ratio: Want the Best Profits? Head East and South

Over the next five to ten years, watch for India to catch up to China in terms of economic growth. Without the one-child policy, it’s better positioned to take advantage of a favorable work-age ratio.

And if you’re looking for a way to take advantage of this trend, investing in an international ETF means you can inject some foreign diversity into your portfolio in just five minutes.

Look for PowerShares India (NYSE: PIN) to profit.

Other countries with beneficial dependency ratios include Nicaragua, Panama and Brazil. And with regard to Brazil, it also jives with more traditional economic analysis, which shows that the nation could outpace countries like China in the near future.

And to profit from the favorable Brazilian trend, funds like iShares MSCI Brazil (NYSE: EWZ).

Sometimes, it pays to not overthink situations, or get bogged down in a sea of conflicting statistics. Age is something that is difficult to fake. Finding the next high-growth country can be as simple as looking at some census data and buying an ETF.

For more great insight, check out our investment opportunities page. 

Written By
mweinschenk

6 Comments

  • Your dependency ratio article was a very good read. I have one comment re: the future dependency ratio in the USA. I think that aging factor you mentioned needs to be tempered by the almost unlimited number of aliens entering the country. Almost all of these are young folks and no telling how many millions of them will continue to pour in and keep the US work force “young”.

  • Your Dependency chart doesn’t take into consideration the huge unknown factor that most people are unaware of….

    Labour forces will be minimalized anyway with the new automation that is here today! “See any people in to robotic car commercials” telling us something…they don’t need population – bye bye unions, and change your eating habits or the poisons past by the FDA will continue to shorten your life> Eugenics – thinning of the herd is already in place.

  • There are so many ways to view these things. Jim the illegals I encounter don’t support the society they live and work in.Their work and economic activity is a closed loop with most of the disposable income returned to the country of origin. Many have ‘anchor’ babies and are a severe drain on social services of every kind. I have read how much it truly costs us as a country to entertain this cheap labor… I am sure it would be much cheaper, and beneficial to our society to pick our own cotton.

  • Great article very helpful to me and corraborated with other opinions on what countries will grow the most in the future that i have been reading. which by the way did not include china as everyone thinks. I am surprised you didn’t memtions japans demographic problems.

  • I am very interested in the dependency ration debate, and I cannot agree with you more that it is a key if not central determinant of the state of national economies. However, my feeling is that while it is good to look at dependency ratios at national scales for statistical purposes that will guide us in macro economic planning, we should never ever neglect dependency ratios at the micro level, namely the household. There are many dynamics at play, especially in developing countries such as my own Zimbabwe whereby children aged below 14 years are actively contributing to household and national income through their work. I believe that by taking the discourse of dependency ratio to that micro level we can meaningfully unlock poverty cycles that have sustained rural poverty in most developing countries

  • Indeed in my opinion, age and (formal employability) are no longer sufficient, if accurate, variables for measuring dependency ratios. Many adults aged over 64 and children below 14 years are fast becoming income earners in countries where poverty levels are high, so we need to qualitatively explore this concept further until we can provide a more flexible and inclusive definition of dependency ratios. With such we can be able to inform policies in diverse social fields such as by recommending intensified HIV prevention measures in order to reduce the dependency burden of chronically ill patients. This group (the chronically ill) and the disabled are scantly considered in discussing dependency ratios because age and economic activity are prioritised within the context of income earning. Dependency however extends to care giving relationships – a domain where women play a telling part in households. I think therefore that the predominant focus on macro level dependency ratio and economic bias of discussions thereof sidelines the female gender and renders the efforts of women to cater for their care recipients irrelevant.

Leave a Reply